Current:Home > FinanceKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Wealth Harmony Labs
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-27 21:11:51
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (6132)
Related
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Garland says officers’ torture of 2 Black men was betrayal of community they swore to protect
- Hoda Kotb Announces She's Leaving Today After More Than 16 Years
- Local officials in upstate New York acquitted after ballot fraud trial
- Paris Olympics live updates: Quincy Hall wins 400m thriller; USA women's hoops in action
- Court throws out manslaughter charge against clerk in Detroit gas station shooting
- College football Week 5 predictions for every Top 25 game start with Georgia-Alabama picks
- Opinion: Pac-12 revival deserves nickname worthy of cheap sunglasses
- Olympic men's basketball bracket: Results of the 5x5 tournament
- Hurricane Helene is unusual — but it’s not an example of the Fujiwhara Effect
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- UFC reaches $375 million settlement on one class-action lawsuit, another one remains pending
- Shohei Ohtani 50/50 home run ball headed to auction. How much will it be sold for?
- Catherine Zeta-Jones Bares All in Nude Photo for Michael Douglas’ Birthday
- Taylor Swift Cancels Austria Concerts After Confirmation of Planned Terrorist Attack
- MLB blows up NL playoff race by postponing Mets vs. Braves series due to Hurricane Helene
- How to watch People's Choice Country Awards, where Beyoncé, Zach Bryan lead 2024 nominees
- What is Galaxy Gas? New 'whippets' trend with nitrous oxide products sparks concerns
Recommendation
Louisiana high court temporarily removes Judge Eboni Johnson Rose from Baton Rouge bench amid probe
Naomi Campbell banned from charity role for 5 years after financial investigation
The great supermarket souring: Why Americans are mad at grocery stores
How Rooted Books in Nebraska is combatting book bans: 'We really, really care'
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
Republican Wisconsin congressman falsely suggests city clerk was lying about absentee ballots
5 women, 1 man shot during Los Angeles drive-by shooting; 3 suspects at large
Tropical Weather Latest: Hurricane Helene is upgraded to Category 2 as it heads toward Florida